Each button below pulls back the curtain: I’ll show what these organisations say they are and what they really are. For each entry I’ll strip away the PR, name the players, and lay out, simply and bluntly, how they fit into the push for mandatory digital ID. Some groups matter more right now than others; I’ll connect the dots and explain why every one of them plays a part.
I’ll publish the receipts - original documents, quotes, policy papers and signposts to coverage - and I’ll announce every update as I add it. This isn’t just about the UK Government, Labour or a few think-tanks: it runs far deeper. The UN and WEF have publicly sketched a global agenda (the 17 Sustainable Development Goals), and I argue digital ID is the linchpin they need to make that agenda operational.
Expect sharp, sourced briefings and social updates as I dig; I’m pulling together the facts so you can see who’s shaping the rules, who stands to gain, and why "convenience" often hides control.
When reading documents, agendas, plans or official reports, use this glossary as your benchmark: interrogate every buzzword, metric and promise to expose who gains, where the money flows and which technical levers will lock the system in.
We must discard the illusion that they are in control; MPs, ministers and the Prime Minister are the visible faces, but they do not design the architecture; they implement it. The real decisions come from an international network of agencies, foundations, unelected bureaucrats, banks and tech platforms — the true “architects” — who build, fund and sell the infrastructure that governs how everyone lives.
This is not about “begging” MPs or “petitioning” a government that has already shown it does not care — it ignored 2.8 million signatures. That shrug is proof that democratic ritual can be sidelined while a technical and financial machine pushes the scaffolding of surveillance, scoring and exclusion into place.
Know thine enemy: map the architects, follow the money, read the playbook. This is not about left or right, and it does not care about race, faith or how you vote; it flattens everyone into data points and rules.
We will not ask politely for mercy or give credit where none is due. We will make plain that these "officials" do not speak for us. While they are paid to answer to us and to work for us, the reality is that they answer to a globalist set of interests.
We see them for what they are — a Parliament of puppets — and we will not comply.
We demand our freedom — uncontrolled, untracked, untraced and uncompromised.